Quality Assessment of Observational Studies for Systematic Reviews

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A suggestion for quality assessment in systematic reviews of observational studies in nutritional epidemiology

OBJECTIVES It is important to control the quality level of the observational studies in conducting meta-analyses. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) is a representative tool used for this purpose. We investigated the relationship between high-quality (HQ) defined using NOS and the results of subgroup analysis according to study design. METHODS We selected systematic review studies with meta-ana...

متن کامل

Quality of Systematic Reviews of Observational Nontherapeutic Studies

INTRODUCTION High-quality epidemiologic research is essential in reducing chronic diseases. We analyzed the quality of systematic reviews of observational nontherapeutic studies. METHODS We searched several databases for systematic reviews of observational nontherapeutic studies that examined the prevalence of or risk factors for chronic diseases and were published in core clinical journals f...

متن کامل

Quality Assessment in Systematic Reviews: A Literature Review of Health Economic Evaluation of Hepatitis Studies

The trend of carrying out a systematic review of systematic reviews has just been concentrated in clinical-effectiveness. In aspect of cost-effectiveness, there has not been any review of reviews implemented in economic evaluation of hepatitis. The aim of this study is to appraise qualitatively a range of systematic reviews of economic evaluation in case of hepatitis based on PRISMA guidelines....

متن کامل

Quality of Systematic Reviews

As a systematic review is a scientific exercise, and will influence health care decisions, it should have the same rigour that is expected of all research. The quality of a review, and so it’s worth, depends on the extent to which scientific review methods were used to minimise the risk of error and bias. It is the use of these explicit and rigorous methods that distinguish systematic reviews f...

متن کامل

Development of a quality assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO) of HIV prevalence in men having sex with men and associated risk behaviours

BACKGROUND Systematic reviews based on the critical appraisal of observational and analytic studies on HIV prevalence and risk factors for HIV transmission among men having sex with men are very useful for health care decisions and planning. Such appraisal is particularly difficult, however, as the quality assessment tools available for use with observational and analytic studies are poorly est...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Value in Health

سال: 2013

ISSN: 1098-3015

DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.08.1774